While CPU, memory, OS and other variables don't often make a huge difference, there are some nonetheless. We have a computer that is used only for testing hardware. We do this so all tests can be compared reliably.

Test System:

CPU: AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ 2.4GHz
Motherboard: ASUS M2N-SLI Deluxe with BIOS 0304
Memory: Corsair TWIN2X2048-6400
Video Card: MSI NX7900GT-T2D256E - ForceWare v93.71
Hard Drive: Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 SATA 3.0Gb/s 320GB
Operating System: Windows XP SP2 - NVIDIA nForce v9.16

For Blu-ray Disc writers, the performance tests are normally broken down into six sections: CD read, CD write, DVD read, DVD write, BD read and BD write. Each benchmark test has been run three times. The score given is an average of the three. DMA has been enabled in device manager for all IDE devices supporting it.

CD Read Tests: For the read performance section of the CD-ROM benchmarks, CD WinBench 99 v3.0 and CD Speed v4.7.5 are used to test read speeds, seek times and CPU usage. For DAE testing, CD Speed is used to give an overall speed rating.

CD Write Tests: To test the write speeds, Nero Burning Rom is used to write 650MB and 700MB to our test media. Times are recorded. To test rewrite scores, Nero is used again to time how long it takes to write 400MB of random files and directories. Then Sonic's DLA is used to test packet writing speeds. The same files are copied and pasted in Windows Explorer and timed.

DVD Read Tests: For the read performance section of the DVD benchmarks CD Speed v4.7.5 is used to test read speeds, seek times, and CPU usage.

DVD Write Tests: To test the DVD write speeds, Nero Burning Rom is used to write a 4.38GB image to our test media. Times are recorded. Then Sonic's DLA is used to test packet writing speeds. For this, 4GB of random files and directories are copied and pasted in Windows Explorer and timed.

BD Read Tests: For the read performance section of the BD benchmarks, CD Speed v4.7.5 is used to test read speeds, seek times, and CPU usage.

BD Write Tests: To test the BD write speeds, CD Speed's "Create Data Disc" feature is used to burn an entire BD-R/RE disc. Times are recorded.

CD Winbench 99 Scores:

   LG
GGW-H10N
Sony
BWU-100A
I-O DATA
BRD-AM2B/U
CD Winbench 99 939 KB/sec 1465 KB/sec 1484 KB/sec
Transfer Rate: Inside 2300 KB/sec 2410 KB/sec 2410 KB/sec
Transfer Rate: Outside 4560 KB/sec 4770 KB/sec 4770 KB/sec
Random Access Time 187ms 132ms 131ms
CPU Utilization 0% 0.41% 0.32%

The CD Winbench test is as close as we can get to testing every day usage. It fires off eight different applications using scripts. This tries to mimic the activities of a person loading these programs onto their own computer.

LG's Super Multi Blue drive gave us some mixed performance in our CD Winbench tests.In the transfer speed tests, the GGW-H10N started reading at 15.3x (2300 / 150) and reached a maximum speed of about 30.4x (4560 / 150) on the outside. While this is pretty good for a drive with a maximum read speed of 32x, its access time and overall score and access time were not as good as some of the other Blu-ray Disc writers we've looked at.

CD Speed v4.7.5 - Pressed CD:

For this test I used a pressed CD containing one Mode 1 data track. The disc is 74:38 in size and is full of data and directories.



   LG
GGW-H10N
Sony
BWU-100A
I-O DATA
BRD-AM2B/U
Transfer Speed
Average:
Start:
End:

25.44x
13.94x
33.63x

24.89x
14.39x
32.83x

24.85x
14.32x
32.85x
Seek Times
Random:
1/3:
Full:

183ms
229ms
376ms

137ms
145ms
273ms

134ms
144ms
274ms
CPU Usage
1x:
2x:
4x:
8x:

1%
1%
3%
5%

0%
1%
3%
3%

0%
1%
3%
4%

LG's new drive performed a little better in our CD Speed tests. The GGW-H10N started reading at 13.94x and reached a maximum transfer speed of 33.63x. Unfortunately, its seek times were higher than we'd like to see.

CD Speed v4.7.5 - CD-R Media:

For this test I made a copy of our pressed test CD. I used 12x rated Memorex Gold 74 minute media for the tests.



   LG
GGW-H10N
Sony
BWU-100A
I-O DATA
BRD-AM2B/U
Transfer Speed
Average:
Start:
End:

25.93x
14.04x
34.40x

25.17x
14.30x
33.29x

24.75x
14.34x
32.67x
Seek Times
Random:
1/3:
Full:

186ms
236ms
366ms

148ms
160ms
242ms

145ms
158ms
237ms
CPU Usage
1x:
2x:
4x:
8x:

1%
1%
3%
5%

0%
2%
3%
4%

0%
2%
3%
4%

The GGW-H10N was a little faster when reading CD-R media. Thanks to this small speed boost, the drive was able to reach a maximum transfer speed of more than 34x. Unfortunately, its seek times were again quite high.

LG's new Super Multi Blue drive had no problems recognizing our 99 minute CompUSA media. It read our test disc from start to finish, reaching a maximum transfer speed of 36.98x.

CD Speed v4.7.5 - CD-RW Media:

For this test I made a copy of a pressed test CD. I used some PNY 80 minute CD-RW media for the tests.



   LG
GGW-H10N
Sony
BWU-100A
I-O DATA
BRD-AM2B/U
Transfer Speed
Average:
Start:
End:

18.99x
10.89x
25.08x

18.54x
10.71x
24.43x

18.61x
10.74x
24.57x
Seek Times
Random:
1/3:
Full:

188ms
217ms
351ms

152ms
162ms
244ms

130ms
141ms
221ms
CPU Usage
1x:
2x:
4x:
8x:

1%
1%
2%
5%

0%
2%
3%
4%

1%
2%
3%
4%

Like the drives from Sony and I-O DATA, the GGW-H10N's CD-RW read speeds are limited to only 24x. As you can see, the drive had no problems reaching this speed in our tests.

CD DAE and CD Speed v4.7.5 - Pressed CD:

For this test I used Pure Funk. The CD is almost exactly 74 minutes. This helps to squeeze the maximum performance out of the CD.

Exact Audio Copy can tell us a lot about a drive's capabilities. You can see from the screen shot that while the LG GGW-H10N supports accurate stream and has the ability to retrieve C2 error information from the CD, it does not cache audio data.

CD Speed LG
GGW-H10N
Sony
BWU-100A
I-O DATA
BRD-AM2B/U
Average:
Start:
End:
DAE Quality:
Accurate Stream:
25.59x
14.04x
33.84x
10
Yes
18.66x
10.98x
24.75x
10
Yes
18.66x
10.96x
24.75x
10
Yes

The GGW-H10N performed relatively well when ripping pressed audio CD's. With a maximum DAE speed of 33.84x, it had no problems taking the top spot in our tests.

CD DAE and CD Speed v4.7.5 - CD-R Media:

For this test I used a copy of the Pure Funk CD. It's burned onto the same Memorex Gold 74 minute media I used in the CD Speed tests.



CD Speed LG
GGW-H10N
Sony
BWU-100A
I-O DATA
BRD-AM2B/U
Average:
Start:
End:
DAE Quality:
Accurate Stream:
25.40x
14.17x
33.46x
10
Yes
18.46x
10.88x
24.31x
10
Yes
18.48x
10.90x
24.31x
10
Yes

While LG's new Super Multi Blue drive was a little slower when ripping audio CD-R discs, it had no problems reaching a maximum DAE speed of 33x in our tests. So how did it do in CD Speed's advanced DAE tests? Take a look below.

The GGW-H10N completed CD Speed's advanced DAE tests with an average score of 17.58x. While the drive was able to go through the tests without creating any errors, it was unable to pass all of the on the fly copying tests.If you look at the advanced features, you can see that the GGW-H10N was able to read the subchannel data but failed to read the CD-Text as well as the lead in and lead out sections of the CD.

To see how well LG's Super Multi Blue drive can read scratched and dirty discs, I used CD Speed's ScanDisc utility to see how many sectors were damaged or unreadable. This is a very rough, but good way to test the drive's error correcting abilities.


CD Speed - ScanDisc

The GGW-H10N seems to have some issues with CD Speed's ScanDisc utility. By looking at the screenshot, you can see that the drive considered 100% of the CD to be "damaged". I reran the test using a clean, unscratched CD and the results were the same.

You can also get an idea of how well the drive can read scratched and dirty discs by using CD DAE. CD DAE will extract the audio tracks twice and then compare them. From this information we can see what the drive's average speed was and how many errors it generated.

CD DAE Avg. Speed Errors % of Disc
LG GGW-H10N 14.3x 2327759 0.30%
Sony BWU-100A 17.6x 66749492 8.51%
I-O DATA BRD-AM2B/U 1.6x 2446960 0.31%

The GGW-H10N gave some mixed results in this test. While it had the lowest number of errors, the scratches on the disc caused it to slow down considerably.