While CPU, memory, OS and other variables don't often make a huge difference, there are some nonetheless. We have a computer that is used only for testing hardware. We do this so all tests can be compared reliably.
Test System:
CPU: | AMD Athlon 64 3200+ 2.0GHz | |
Motherboard: | ASUS K8V SE Deluxe with BIOS 1003 | |
Memory: | 2 x 256MB Kingston PC3200 | |
Video Card: | XFX NVIDIA GeForce FX5200 - ForceWare v56.72 | |
Hard Drive: | Hitachi Deskstar 7K80 80GB SATA 7200RPM | |
Operating System: | Windows XP SP2 - VIA Hyperion Pro v5.04 |
For DVD writers the performance tests are broken down into four sections: CD read, CD write, DVD read and DVD write tests. Each benchmark test has been run three times. The score given is an average of the three. DMA has been enabled in device manager for all IDE devices supporting it.
CD Read Tests: For the read performance section of the CD-ROM benchmarks, CD WinBench 99 v3.0 and CD Speed v4.70 are used to test read speeds, seek times and CPU usage. For DAE testing both CD Speed and CD DAE are used. CD Speed is used to give an overall DAE speed rating and CD DAE is used to give the track by track extraction speeds and to check the extracted tracks for errors the drive may have created.
CD Write Tests: To test the write speeds, Nero Burning Rom is used to write 700MB to our test media. Times are recorded. To test rewrite scores, Nero is used again to time how long it takes to write 400MB of random files and directories. Then Sonic's DLA is used to test packet writing speeds. The same files are copied and pasted in Windows Explorer and timed.
DVD Read Tests: For the read performance section of the DVD benchmarks CD Speed v4.70 is used to test read speeds, seek times, and CPU usage.
DVD Write Tests: To test the DVD write speeds, Nero Burning Rom is used to write 4GB to our test media. Times are recorded. Then Sonic's DLA is used to test packet writing speeds. The same files are copied and pasted in Windows Explorer and timed.
CD Winbench 99 Scores:
LG GSA-H22N |
Samsung SH-S182D |
Plextor PX-760A |
LG GSA-H10N |
|
CD Winbench 99 | 1210 KB/sec | 1810 KB/sec | 2350 KB/sec | 1190 KB/sec |
Transfer Rate: Inside | 3070 KB/sec | 3295 KB/sec | 3400 KB/sec | 3183 KB/sec |
Transfer Rate: Outside | 6420 KB/sec | 6560 KB/sec | 6960 KB/sec | 6350 KB/sec |
Random Access Time | 115ms | 95ms | 95ms | 106ms |
CPU Utilization | 0.36% | 0.41% | 0.33% | 0.58% |
The CD Winbench test is as close as we can get to testing every day usage. It fires off eight different applications using scripts. This tries to mimic the activities of a person loading these programs onto their own computer.
LG's new "Super-Multi" drive gave us some mixed performance in our CD Winbench tests. While the GSA-H22N's overall score wasn't as high as some of the other drives, its transfer rates were fairly good.It started reading at 20.5x (3070 / 150) and reached a maximum speed of about 42.8x (6420 / 150) on the outside.
CD Speed v4.70 - Pressed CD:
For this test I used a pressed CD containing one Mode 1 data track. The disc is 74:38 in size and is full of data and directories.
LG GSA-H22N |
Samsung SH-S182D |
Plextor PX-760A |
LG GSA-H10N |
|
Transfer Speed Average: Start: End: |
35.78x 20.57x 47.32x |
36.54x 20.89x 48.30x |
36.76x 21.27x 48.63x |
35.57x 20.42x 46.78x |
Seek Times Random: 1/3: Full: |
107ms 110ms 178ms |
105ms 114ms 178ms |
96ms 113ms 172ms |
114ms 130ms 175ms |
CPU Usage 1x: 2x: 4x: 8x: |
1% 1% 3% 7% |
0% 1% 3% 6% |
0% 1% 2% 4% |
1% 1% 3% 21% |
The GSA-H22N didn't perform as well as I had expected when reading pressed CD's. While rated at 48x, LG's new drive came up a little short of this number in our tests.
CD Speed v4.70 - CD-R Media:
For this test I made a copy of our pressed test CD. I used 12x rated Memorex Gold 74 minute media for the tests.
LG GSA-H22N |
Samsung SH-S182D |
Plextor PX-760A |
LG GSA-H10N |
|
Transfer Speed Average: Start: End: |
36.56x 20.88x 48.40x |
31.43x 17.83x 41.64x |
36.64x 20.99x 48.56x |
36.30x 20.76x 47.85x |
Seek Times Random: 1/3: Full: |
111ms 119ms 183ms |
103ms 110ms 180ms |
96ms 115ms 177ms |
113ms 132ms 205ms |
CPU Usage 1x: 2x: 4x: 8x: |
1% 1% 3% 7% |
1% 1% 3% 6% |
0% 1% 2% 4% |
1% 2% 3% 21% |
The GSA-H22N was a little faster when reading CD-R media. Thanks to this small speed boost, it had no problems reaching a maximum transfer speed of 48x.
LG's new DVD writer had no problems recognizing our 99 minute CompUSA media. The GSA-H22N read our test disc from start to finish, reaching a maximum transfer speed of 52.38x.
CD Speed v4.70 - CD-RW Media:
For this test I made a copy of a pressed test CD. I used some PNY 80 minute CD-RW media for the tests.
LG GSA-H22N |
Samsung SH-S182D |
Plextor PX-760A |
LG GSA-H10N |
|
Transfer Speed Average: Start: End: |
31.43x 18.19x 41.50x |
30.87x 17.67x 40.75x |
31.57x 18.36x 41.70x |
30.58x 17.66x 40.13x |
Seek Times Random: 1/3: Full: |
109ms 120ms 181ms |
102ms 109ms 178ms |
95ms 111ms 170ms |
112ms 129ms 182ms |
CPU Usage 1x: 2x: 4x: 8x: |
1% 1% 3% 7% |
1% 1% 3% 6% |
0% 1% 2% 4% |
1% 2% 3% 16% |
Like the other drives, the GSA-H22N's CD-RW read speeds are limited to only 40x. As you can see, the drive had no problems reaching this speed in our tests.
CD DAE and CD Speed v4.70 - Pressed CD:
For this test I used Pure Funk. The CD is almost exactly 74 minutes. This helps to squeeze the maximum performance out of the CD.
Exact Audio Copy can tell us a lot about a drive's capabilities. You can see from the screen shot that while the LG GSA-H22N supports accurate stream, it does not cache audio data nor does it have the ability to retrieve C2 error information from the CD.
CD Speed | LG GSA-H22N |
Samsung SH-S182D |
Plextor PX-760A |
LG GSA-H10N |
Average: Start: End: DAE Quality: Accurate Stream: |
31.61x 18.25x 41.75x 10 Yes |
31.09x 17.78x 41.08x 10 Yes |
31.35x 17.97x 41.48x 10 Yes |
30.73x 17.95x 40.68x 10 Yes |
The GSA-H22N did fairly well in our DAE tests. While not nearly as fast as some of the other DVD writers we've tested, it hadno problems ripping pressed audio CD's at 41x.
To get a better look at the quality of the extracted audio we use CD DAE. CD DAE is actually designed to be an audio ripping program. It converts the CD-DA on the CD to .wav files. We use it in our testing because it can also be used as a quick and easy way to test the quality. Where CD Speed tests the DAE as one large session, CD DAE extracts each CD track individually. It actually extracts each track twice and then compares them to check for any errors. Every error a drive creates could be a hiss or pop you would hear later in the audio tracks.
CD DAE | LG GSA-H22N |
Samsung SH-S182D |
Plextor PX-760A |
LG GSA-H10N |
Average: Min: Max: |
29.0x 19.0x 40.6x |
29.1x 18.7x 40.2x |
29.6x 18.5x 40.6x |
29.0x 18.4x 39.8x |
Errors | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
While the GSA-H22N started out a little faster when extracting our test CD with CD DAE, its average and maximum speeds were slower than what we saw with CD Speed.
CD DAE and CD Speed v4.70 - CD-R Media:
For this test I used a copy of the Pure Funk CD. It's burned onto the same Memorex Gold 74 minute media I used in the CD Speed tests.
CD Speed | LG GSA-H22N |
Samsung SH-S182D |
Plextor PX-760A |
LG GSA-H10N |
Average: Start: End: DAE Quality: Accurate Stream: |
31.32x 18.23x 41.29x 10 Yes |
30.80x 17.67x 40.62x 10 Yes |
31.52x 18.28x 41.56x 10 Yes |
30.48x 17.94x 40.27x 10 Yes |
While the GSA-H22N was a little slower when extracting audio from CD-R media, this didn't keep it from reaching amaximum DAE speed of 40x in our tests. So how did it do in CD Speed's advanced DAE tests? Take a look below.
LG's new DVD writer completed CD Speed's advanced DAE tests with an average score of 29.78x. While the drive wasn't able to pass all of the on the fly copying tests, it did not create any errors. If you look at the advanced features, you can see that the GSA-H22N was able to read the CD-Text, subchannel data and lead in but failed to read the lead out section of the CD.
CD DAE | LG GSA-H22N |
Samsung SH-S182D |
Plextor PX-760A |
LG GSA-H10N |
Average: Min: Max: |
28.4x 19.0x 40.2x |
29.0x 18.7x 40.0x |
29.9x 19.0x 40.6x |
28.8x 18.4x 39.3x |
Errors | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
To see how well LG's DVD writer can read scratched and dirty discs, I used CD Speed's ScanDisc utility to see how many sectors were damaged or unreadable. This is a very rough, but good way to test the drive's error correcting abilities.
CD Speed - ScanDisc
The GSA-H22N handled scratched discs relatively well. By looking at the screenshot, you can see that the drive considered only 53.2% of the CD to be "damaged". More importantly, none of the sectors on the disc were unreadable.
You can also get an idea of how well the drive can read scratched and dirty discs by using CD DAE. CD DAE will extract the audio tracks twice and then compare them. From this information we can see what the drive's average speed was and how many errors it generated.
CD DAE | Avg. Speed | Errors | % of Disc |
LG GSA-H22N |
14.4x | 111630297 | 14.25% |
Samsung SH-S182D |
28.9x | 2099160 | 0.27% |
Plextor PX-760A |
23.2x | 73854517 | 9.60% |
LG GSA-H10N |
28.7x | 37659512 | 4.81% |
The GSA-H22N didn't do as well this time around. The scratches on the disc not only slowed it down considerably, the number of errors was higher than what we'd like to see.