The test system used in this review was a Dell OptiPlex 755. The computer came equipped with an Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 2.66GHz CPU, 2GB of DDR2 800MHz memory, a Western Digital WD800JD 80GB SATA hard drive and an ATI Radeon HD 2400XT 256MB video card. For the operating system, I installed a fresh copy of Windows XP with Service Pack 3.
To test the performance of the DataTravler 150, I ran a series of benchmarks using HD Tach RW 3.0.4.0 and SiSoftware Sandra Professional Business XII.SP2c. To get a feel for the "real world" performance, I also copied and pasted 500MB of random files and directories in Windows Explorer. For comparison, I've also included test results from Imation's Atom and Memorex's Mini TravelDrive.
HD Tach RW 3.0.4.0:
Using HD Tach, we can benchmark a drive's read, write and burst speeds as well as its seek times and CPU usage.
The DataTraveler 150 performed surprisingly well here. Looking at the screenshot above, you can see that it had average read and write speeds of 33.1 MB/s and 14.6 MB/s, respectively, as well as a burst speed of 35 MB/s.
SiSoft Sandra File System Benchmark:
While I am not a big fan of SiSoftware Sandra's optical drive benchmarks, it is a great tool if you want to test a system's performance quickly and easily. One of Sandra's more useful tests is the File System benchmark. This benchmark gives each drive an overall score, or "Drive Index," based on the results of its read and write tests.
Kingston DataTraveler 150 |
Imation Atom | Memorex Mini TravelDrive | |
Drive Index: | 28.36 MB/s | 16.63 MB/s | 14.47 MB/s |
Buffered Read: | 31.54 MB/s | 19.22 MB/s | 15.99 MB/s |
Sequential Read: | 32.46 MB/s | 19.31 MB/s | 15.87 MB/s |
Random Read: | 32.42 MB/s | 19.24 MB/s | 15.74 MB/s |
Buffered Write: | 235 kB/s | 470 kB/s | 3.09 MB/s |
Sequential Write: | 17.32 MB/s | 7.55 MB/s | 7.43 MB/s |
Random Write: | 4.04 MB/s | 3.75 MB/s | 7 MB/s |
The DT150 performed very well when reading and doing sequential writes. Unfortunately, it wasn't nearly as fast as the TravelDrive when doing buffered and random writes.
SiSoftware Sandra Removable Storage/Flash Devices Benchmark:
Designed with removable storage and flash devices in mind, this benchmark tests a drive's read, write and delete performance using six different file sizes (512 Bytes, 32kB, 256kB, 2MB, 64MB and 256MB). The results are then given in both operations per minute and the corresponding net transfer rate in kB/second. This benchmark also computes an "Endurance Factor," representing the wear and life expectancy of flash devices.
Kingston DataTraveler 150 |
Imation Atom | Memorex Mini TravelDrive | |
512B Read: | 146 kB/s | 196 kB/s | 173 kB/s |
32kB Read: | 5430 kB/s | 6050 kB/s | 6190 kB/s |
256kB Read: | 20870 kB/s | 16320 kB/s | 13260 kB/s |
2MB Read: | 29570 kB/s | 18630 kB/s | 15430 kB/s |
64MB Read: | 30930 kB/s | 19200 kB/s | 16000 kB/s |
256MB Read: | 34130 kB/s | 17070 kB/s | 17070 kB/s |
The DT150 was a little slower than the other drives when reading 512B and 32kB files. Nevertheless, it performed very well when reading larger files, reaching a maximum speed of 34,130 kB/s.
Kingston DataTraveler 150 |
Imation Atom | Memorex Mini TravelDrive | |
512B Write: | 10 kB/s | 15 kB/s | 11 kB/s |
32kB Write: | 547 kB/s | 494 kB/s | 1060 kB/s |
256kB Write: | 4030 kB/s | 4020 kB/s | 3420 kB/s |
2MB Write: | 8100 kB/s | 4000 kB/s | 4570 kB/s |
64MB Write: | 16000 kB/s | 6400 kB/s | 9600 kB/s |
256MB Write: | 17070 kB/s | 8530 kB/s | 8530 kB/s |
While there were a few cases where the DT150 lagged behind the other drives, it had a clear advantage when writing larger files, especially those 64MB and 256MB in size.
Kingston DataTraveler 150 |
Imation Atom | Memorex Mini TravelDrive | |
Combined Index: | 1940 | 2813 | 2914 |
512B Files Test: | 2691 | 4082 | 3179 |
32kB Files Test: | 2304 | 3507 | 3850 |
256kB Files Test: | 1789 | 1714 | 1381 |
2MB Files Test: | 427 | 240 | 235 |
64MB Files Test: | 20 | 10 | 11 |
256MB Files Test: | 5 | 2 | 3 |
The DT150 yielded some mixed results in this test. While it completed an impressive number of operations with 2MB, 64MB and 256MB files, its lackluster performance with 512B and 32kB files had a negative effect on its combined index score.
Kingston DataTraveler 150 |
Imation Atom | Memorex Mini TravelDrive | |
Endurance Factor: | 15.00 | 17.80 | 14.70 |
The Endurance Factor represents the wear and life expectancy of a flash device. According to SiSoft, this number is computed by "dividing the average performance (normal condition, i.e. sequential write) to the lowest performance (high-stress condition, i.e. same block re-write)."
"Real World" Benchmark:
To test the "real world" performance of Kingston's new flash drive, I copied and pasted 500 MB worth of randomly generated files and directories. All of the files are between 10 bytes and 32MB in size and no more than four directories deep.
Kingston DataTraveler 150 |
Imation Atom | Memorex Mini TravelDrive | |
Write: | 2:31 | 2:28 | 2:45 |
Read: | 15 seconds | 20 seconds | 19 seconds |
For some reason I expected the DT150 to pull through and take the top spot in this test. As you can see, that wasn't the case. While the fastest of the three drives when reading, it was three seconds slower than the Imation Atom when writing.
Conclusion:
With the DataTraveler 150, Kingston has joined the ranks of companies offering high-capacity USB flash drives. While not the smallest or most feature packed drive out there, the DT150 delivers what most consumers are looking for: lots of storage at a reasonable price. Kingston's new drive also performed fairly well for the most part. The DT150 reached some impressive speeds when reading and writing large files, but lagged behind some other drives when working with smaller files. Nevertheless, most consumers probably won't notice this during everyday use.
The DataTraverler 150 is available now in 32GB and 64GB capacities. Suggested retail prices range from $116 to $177 depending on the size. However, the DT150 can be picked up for considerably less through some of the vendors on Pricegrabber.
Highs:
- Large capacity lets you store lots of stuff
- Impressive speeds when reading and writing large files
- Compatible with Windows 2000/XP/Vista, Mac OS X and Linux
- Five year warranty
- Reasonably priced
Lows:
- No data encryption software
- Not as fast when reading and writing small files
- Does not support Windows ReadyBoost