Digitimes proves once again how unreliable/biased they are.

[RJW]

This one clearly shows how biased digitimes is

http://www.digitimes.com/systems/a20061011A6026.html

First no word on infomedia. Infomedia had Philips (full) approval much earlier as any own media of Ritek and CMC. Infomedia is still making 16x DVD+R

Then next Optodisc is ignored. Why they talked earlier about optodisc 16x media having a price cut.
Same for PRinco however in that case you might be able to say maybe there not there because princo dvd recordable disc isn't a real dvd recordable disc thanks to not paying the correct licenses which are needed.

Also what is prodisc doing there ? They might make 16x rated recordables but under the current situation I think prodisc does not have all needed licenses so these disc's aren't DVD-R's or DVD+R's at the moment.

For Princo & Optodisc reference on digitimes check.
http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20060822PB201.html

[dolphinius_rex]

Heh, you beat me to it! I was going to write this exact complaint earlier, but didn't have the time until now.

I hate how digitimes always spins things.

[Ian]

I'm guessing Infomedia and Optodisc didn't bribe Digitimes this month.

[dolphinius_rex]

I'm guessing Infomedia and Optodisc didn't bribe Digitimes this month.

That's hilarious, I said the exact same thing on the CDFreaks news comment section for this topic

[Ian]

Great, now they're going to think you and I are the same person.

[dolphinius_rex]

Great, now they're going to think you and I are the same person.

Hrm, I think the world would implode if that were true

[Scour]

The world still exist, I guess