|
||||||||
|
Scour wrote:@Dolph
So you guess the 4x +R-CMC is not very stable? The -R 4x was the first DVD-media I used, still working fine after 2 years; and after all I saw, that is much longer than with a few kinds of Ritek-media.
dolphinius_rex wrote:....so I'm partially basing my opinion on the performance of CMC's 8x media, including stability tests.
Scour wrote:dolphinius_rex wrote:....so I'm partially basing my opinion on the performance of CMC's 8x media, including stability tests.
The CMC 8x do very well in the stability-tests of c´t
[buck] wrote:Scour wrote:Hello!
Ricoh R01 and MCC003 are both very good media
Yep, it's hard to go wrong with either of those!
dolphinius_rex wrote:[buck] wrote:Scour wrote:Hello!
Ricoh R01 and MCC003 are both very good media
Yep, it's hard to go wrong with either of those!
Although I happen to *KNOW* that you [buck] have some EXCELLENT examples of why you shouldn't use RICOHJPNR01....Something about significant burn quality degridation within 6-7 months I believe
[buck] wrote:This is why nothing important should be stored on only one media type...
Justin42 wrote:[buck] wrote:This is why nothing important should be stored on only one media type...
There are going to be a lot of people with a lot of rude awakenings in the next 5-10 years when they realise much of the DVD-recordable propoganda was sheer lies......
Convert from crappy VHS to eternal DVD! Never worry about degradation again!(cause instead of starting to slowly look crappy you won't even be able to read the disc at all!)
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 0 guests
All Content is Copyright (c) 2001-2024 CDRLabs Inc. |