New firmware for LTR-52327S: QS0B

by **XIII** on Tue Oct 28, 2003 6:13 pm

LiteOn released a new firmware for the LTR-52327S: QS0B.

What's the difference with QS0C which leaked before QS0B became available?

by **mrk1283** on Tue Oct 28, 2003 6:25 pm

someone test it? :p

by **Harrier** on Tue Oct 28, 2003 8:30 pm

I've bought some Creation Cdrs.
They seem to be Plasmon and very bad quality.

All the burns had C2 errors.
All.
Even when using QS0C and the other leaked firmware.

Media was burned at DAO 16X with data.

by **eliminator** on Tue Oct 28, 2003 9:12 pm

thanks !

by **CDRecorder** on Tue Oct 28, 2003 11:52 pm

I've done several tests (I still haven't posted them, but I'll do that soon); QS0B seems noticibly better than QS0C as far as writing quality is concerned. I now have both of my 52327S drives at QS0B.

by **rdgrimes** on Wed Oct 29, 2003 12:15 am

What about RW quality? QS0C made some big improvements there, anybody try it on QS0B?

by **CDRecorder** on Wed Oct 29, 2003 12:57 am

The recording quality on my Philips 12x CD-RW discs with QS0B seems very good!

BTW, I've finally posted my results at CD Freaks in the media forum, including the CD-RW disc. Unfortunately, I don't have any ultra-speed RW media to test with other than the Lite-On bundled one.

by **mrk1283** on Wed Oct 29, 2003 1:10 am

ill post ULTRA speed cdrw results here, installing qs0b :p

by **mrk1283** on Wed Oct 29, 2003 1:15 am

ill post ULTRA speed cdrw results here, installing qs0b :p

edit* wtf! it says it cannot flash as i have qs0c firmware so wont let me update to qs0b ???? anyone got any idea son how i can flash it to b ?? ;_;

by **CDRecorder** on Wed Oct 29, 2003 1:31 am

Yes; get a binary of QS0B and flash it with MTKWinFlash or another flash program. Or, you could use FlashFix to patch the QS0B installer so that it will allow you to flash anyway.

If you want the QS0B binary, PM me your e-mail address and I'll send it to you.

by **mrk1283** on Wed Oct 29, 2003 1:33 am

ah cheers

by **CDRecorder** on Wed Oct 29, 2003 1:34 am

Wow; quick response!

I'm looking forward to seeing your Ultra-Speed RW tests; I know QS0B works well with my 12x CMC CD-RW discs, but I don't have any Ultra-Speed discs other than the bundled Lite-On one.

by **mrk1283** on Wed Oct 29, 2003 2:06 am

Thanks, flashfix sorted it perfectly.

Ok, qs0c on 24x ultra speed 650MB verbatim media burned with a 605MB video scanned with qs0c

as you can see, qs0c is an OMFG factor scale on 10, either qs0c is not good at cdrw ultra speed or th everbatim media I used is a bit cheese!

Lets move onto qs0b...

qs0b on 24x ultra speed 650MB verbatim media burned with a 605MB video scanned with qs0b

Clearly qs0b is the winner, much lower c1 rate and most importantly NO c2 errors, quite an amazing jump in quality terms here

by **CDRecorder** on Wed Oct 29, 2003 2:16 am

Wow, that's incredible! Thanks for testing those discs!

by **mrk1283** on Wed Oct 29, 2003 2:30 am

No probs

In the media compatability thread I posted the qs0c cdrw 12x on my medianca 700MB discs, Here is an update using qs0b firmware, quiet happy with these discs now, knowing that the previous results were because of the firmware!

What can I say, Lite-On did something special in qs0b, its so far superior to qs09 and qs0c in every way!

by **CDRecorder** on Wed Oct 29, 2003 2:36 am

Nice result! I agree; I think that I haven't seen one result yet where QS0C was better than QS0B.

BTW, do you know who made those Medianca 12x discs?

by **mrk1283** on Wed Oct 29, 2003 2:41 am

yup,

Disc Type = NORMAL CD-RW
Manufacturer = Prodisc Technology Inc.

<< Disc Information >>
Erasable = True
Status of Last Session/Border = Empty Session/Border
Disc Status = Empty Disc
Number of First Track/RZone on Disc = 1
Number of Sessions/Borders(LSB) = 1
First Track/RZone Number in Last Session/Border(LSB) = 1
Last Track/RZone Number in Last Session/Border(LSB) = 1
Disc Identification Valid(DID_V) = False
Disc Bar Code Valid(DBC_V) = False
Unrestricted Use Disc(DRU) = False
Disc Type = Undefined
Disc Identification = 00000000h
Lead-in Start Time of Last Session = 97:32:10(61:20:0Ah)
Last Possible Start Time for Startof Lead-out = 79:59:74(4F:3B:4Ah)
Disc Bar Code = 0000000000000000h
Number of OPC Table Entries = 0

<< Track Information >>
Number of Complete Sessions on Disc = 0

by **CDRecorder** on Wed Oct 29, 2003 3:03 am

Thanks!

by **Bhairav** on Wed Oct 29, 2003 9:36 am

Nice results on those 24X HP-TY discs, CDRecorder. Better than QS0C. I'm posting them @ cdfreaks in a while.

by **rdgrimes** on Wed Oct 29, 2003 1:48 pm

On my drive, I'm seeing little, if any, difference between QS0B and QS0C on RW media.

by **CDRecorder** on Wed Oct 29, 2003 2:04 pm

What kind of RW media are you using, rdgrimes?

by **rdgrimes** on Wed Oct 29, 2003 2:10 pm

CDRecorder wrote:What kind of RW media are you using, rdgrimes?

I've only tested Mitsubishi HS and US.

by **e_atily** on Wed Oct 29, 2003 2:43 pm

HI:

Were in the world you guys got that firmware??

I went to liteon's page and there's nothing similar to it. The latest firmware they have is QS09.

Please guys, I'll appreciate if one of you give me the link to the page so I can download the firmware.

Thanks in advance! :wink:

by **Harrier** on Wed Oct 29, 2003 2:55 pm

Try this link

It gets better at 24X.
It's ashame that this one is the last cdr left.
QS0B makes them a better media than i thought they were in the first place.

by **rdgrimes** on Wed Oct 29, 2003 3:46 pm

I've checked TY and Prodisc CDR at full speed burn and scan, I see no difference between 0B and 0C that's worth mentioning. As always, different drives will behave differently with a given firmware.

Both of these firmwares are just awesome. IMHO, the 52327S is now far and away the fastest and highest burn quality drive at any price. Go LiteOn!

New firmware for LTR-52327S: QS0B

New firmware for LTR-52327S: QS0B

Who is online