|
||||||||
|
thegdog wrote:dolphinius_rex wrote:Looks like Fuji contines to be stupid
Although with the TY problem they had, I can sorta understand... but we still aren't sure who's fault that is entirely.
What was the TY problem they had?
dolphinius_rex wrote:thegdog wrote:dolphinius_rex wrote:Looks like Fuji contines to be stupid
Although with the TY problem they had, I can sorta understand... but we still aren't sure who's fault that is entirely.
What was the TY problem they had?
The media had a high failure rate and was quite problamatic.
Ian wrote:dolphinius_rex wrote:The media had a high failure rate and was quite problamatic.
But then Plextor recommends it for 18x writing?
Gen-An wrote:I'd heard of Fuji TY having problems, but I always attributed it to Fuji's handling since other OEM TY media had no such issues. TY is still the most reliable media IMO.
Gen-An wrote:I wonder why Maxell felt the need to continue to supply 8x media. Verbatim has pretty much switched to 16x for the North American market, though some 8x is still "out there." Verbatim in Europe has been supplying TY, Ritek and CMC for 8x from what I've read on various forums; is the demand for 8x media still that high? 16x media does pretty well at 8x from what I've seen as well as tests I've done myself.
Wesociety wrote:dolphinius_rex wrote:Looks like Fuji contines to be stupid
Stupid?
For using media that utilizes their own Oxonol based dye?
PRODISCF02
I believe that F = Fujifilm.
dolphinius_rex wrote:Just because a good dye is used, does not mean the disc using it is made well. You know better then that
Wesociety wrote:dolphinius_rex wrote:Just because a good dye is used, does not mean the disc using it is made well. You know better then that
I never said anything of the sort.
I was insinuating that it is probably "not stupid" to support a dye that your company has developed. I made no comments on ProdiscF02 quality, as I have not had any firsthand experience with these discs (yet).
Wesociety wrote:I know you love Prodisc!
dolphinius_rex wrote:
They took the song "dare to be stupid" to heart
But hopefully after they merge with Optodisc (if it happens) they'll learn a little bit about some of the do's and don't's of manufacturing DVDs (Frankly, I'd be happy if they just learned how to not need 3-5 different codes for 1 type of disc!!)
RJW wrote:Under the current conditions prodisc business strategy requires at least 3 codes.
So to stay stupid is wrong, because actually this strategy also has some advantages or else they wouldn't be usseing it.
But on the other hand the way how prodisc supplies media for there own brands can be quite frustrating which makes them look stupid to other folks.
Scour wrote:Weird Al Yankovic?
I hope that Optodisc learn something from Prodisc
dolphinius_rex wrote:
What's wrong with Weird Al Yankovic? Or more importantly, what's wrong with the soundtrack for Transformers the Movie?
Regarding Prodisc/Optodisc.... in the merger, the only thing Prodisc has going for them is Production Capacity, which is larger then Optodisc's. Optodisc certainly knows how to run a business better, and when comparing their best media against each other, their is little difference in quality (assuming best conditions for both). Now you have probably encountered a LOT more low grade Optodisc media then A grade, so your experiences are a little biased. This is entirely because Optodisc sends most of their low grade media to Europe.
Scour wrote:Maybe I´m biased because I have not good experiences with Optodiscs 4x-media and RW, but you are biased because of your experiences with older Prodisc
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
All Content is Copyright (c) 2001-2025 CDRLabs Inc. |