|
||||||||
|
Ian wrote:After reading Dolph's review, I'd say its a fair eval of the drive. I have a couple of DW1640 clones here and aside from their lack of support for Verb 8x DVD+RW media, I have no complaints so far.
RJW wrote:The 8x write description was missing on these disc's and because Benq/ Philips require this info (No direct link on MID alone) the drive can not burn it.
I was told that these disc's never should have shipped.
Ian wrote:RJW wrote:The 8x write description was missing on these disc's and because Benq/ Philips require this info (No direct link on MID alone) the drive can not burn it.
I was told that these disc's never should have shipped.
Yeah.. I just got some new samples last week. I haven't had a chance to check the MID's yet.
frank1 wrote:I noticed that on this page of the review:
http://www.extrememhz.com/dw1640-p8.shtml
concerning DVD+R DL he says that he burned several Ritek-D01 MID codes
but he only posts the scan of a Verbatim DVD+R DL and with the MID code MKM-003
His conclusions:
« Stick with Verbatim for double layer folks. You will not be disappointed! »
So, I know: Ritek-D01 is of "bad" quality, but why does he hide these scans ??
For information there are two Plextools scans of samples of the Ritek-D01 MID code
in a review of a BenQ DW1640 here:
http://www.cdrinfo.com/Sections/Reviews ... &PageId=18
dolphinius_rex wrote:I gotta get me some of those!
0000 : 92 0f 04 00 00 03 00 00 00 26 05 3f 00 00 00 00 .........&.?....
0010 : 00 00 01 4d 4b 4d 00 00 00 00 00 41 30 33 00 39 ...MKM.....A03.9
0020 : 23 00 94 79 64 02 20 00 9c 7a 6c 02 20 00 9a 7b #..yd. ..zl. ..{
0030 : 68 02 20 12 12 10 e0 00 f0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 h. .............
0040 : 01 00 17 38 00 29 8b 3e 02 24 00 2d 8e 38 02 24 ...8.).>.$.-.8.$
0050 : 00 2c 90 3e 02 24 44 35 30 e0 f0 30 40 00 00 00 .,.>.$D50..0@...
0000 : 93 0f 04 00 00 03 00 00 00 26 05 3f 00 00 00 00 .........&.?....
0010 : 00 00 03 4d 4b 4d 00 00 00 00 00 41 30 33 00 20 ...MKM.....A03.
0020 : 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
0030 : 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
0040 : 02 00 01 2e 70 54 00 48 ae 32 02 1f 00 50 a0 2c ....pT.H.2...P.,
0050 : 02 21 00 4b aa 2e 02 21 00 00 05 0b 09 00 00 00 .!.K...!........
0060 : 82 00 05 07 00 00 ff ff 01 f6 f4 f2 11 12 00 fd ................
0070 : 00 fe 01 05 01 06 10 0d 00 00 00 00 01 02 00 03 ................
Ian wrote:New samples:
0000 : 93 0f 04 00 00 03 00 00 00 26 05 3f 00 00 00 00 .........&.?....
0010 : 00 00 03 4d 4b 4d 00 00 00 00 00 41 30 33 00 20 ...MKM.....A03.
0020 : 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
0030 : 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
0040 : 02 00 01 2e 70 54 00 48 ae 32 02 1f 00 50 a0 2c ....pT.H.2...P.,
0050 : 02 21 00 4b aa 2e 02 21 00 00 05 0b 09 00 00 00 .!.K...!........
0060 : 82 00 05 07 00 00 ff ff 01 f6 f4 f2 11 12 00 fd ................
0070 : 00 fe 01 05 01 06 10 0d 00 00 00 00 01 02 00 03 ................
You don't require Solid burn unless you want to write the media at higher than rated speed. Example is YUDEN000 T02 will only write at 8x without Solid burn/ Overspeed turned on. Tried to burn TYG03 at 16x with Overspeed enabled and it wrote @2.4 x turned it off and it wrote @16x, so with 16x rated media it's not required. Beta FW BSKC is being tested now and it looks like they have fixed most of the -R bugs. Fuji TY T02 writes well at 8x but writes just as well with Solid burn @12x.Darth wrote:Is the SolidBurn feature necessary if the user sticks to quality media (fuji TY)?
???TCAS wrote:Off course for this shining ripping speed credit goes to ala42 for his hard work and creativity.
dodecahedron wrote:OK.
i thought MCSE was just for editing burning strategies (= control burn speed), not messing with read speads.
good to know.
i might try it out on my BenQ WD1620.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests
All Content is Copyright (c) 2001-2025 CDRLabs Inc. |