Home News Reviews Forums Shop


LG 4166 reviews ?

DVD-R/W, DVD+R/RW, DVD-RAM
Post a reply

LG 4166 reviews ?

Postby ItalianJob on Sat Jan 14, 2006 3:49 pm

I wonder why there is no LG 4166 reviews ?

I'm quite pleased by this drive with the last 1.01 firmware, and wonder why there is no review available anywhere ?

Some good burns I've done so far :

A Plextor DVD-R 8X in case burned @8X, scan done on a BenQ 1620 :
Image

A Verbatim DVD+R 16X (MCC004) printable in case, made in Taiwan :
LG 4166 1.01 burn :
Image
Scan done on a BenQ 1620 :
Image
User avatar
ItalianJob
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 387
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 12:09 pm
Location: France
Top

Postby Scour on Sat Jan 14, 2006 7:34 pm

Hello!

The burns looks very good :)

4166 are rare, only know the 2166 (external) at Cdrlabs, but with 1.00

I heard rumors that newest 4166 have already 1.02-FW
Benq DW 1640 and 1650 , Plextor PX-755, Pioneer BDR-208 and 209D, LG GH24NSC0, LG BH16NS40 and 16NS55, Liteon ihas 124F and 324F, Pioneer DVR-215 and S21, Samsung SH-224DB and 224GB, and some more

cu
Scour
Scour
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 1933
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2001 8:00 pm
Location: Germany
Top

Postby Ian on Sat Jan 14, 2006 8:28 pm

I've had the drive for a few months. After experiencing the 2166's less than stellar performance, I figured I'd give LG a chance to fix things. Now.. I'm just waiting for them to put out an official firmware update.

Which reminds me. I should email them, asking wtf is going on with their firmware updates.. or should I say the lack there of.
"Blu-ray is just a bag of hurt." - Steve Jobs
User avatar
Ian
Grand Poobah
 
Posts: 15145
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2001 2:34 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Top

Postby ItalianJob on Sun Jan 15, 2006 7:21 pm

Scour wrote:Hello!

The burns looks very good :)

4166 are rare, only know the 2166 (external) at Cdrlabs, but with 1.00

I heard rumors that newest 4166 have already 1.02-FW


4166 rare ? Not so rare here in France :
http://www.i-comparateur.com/acheter-x10p0026422.htm
http://www.prixdunet.com/details/LG_GSA4166/

Yeah, drives from december come with 1.02 firmware (seen @ www.actualis.com & "Computer Broker" store in Paris).
The public release seems to be (very) near as far as I know.

By the way, the last ala42's MCSE support 4164 & 4166 drives (they have the same bootcode & are the same).

What else ? My little daughter loves LS :P :
Image
User avatar
ItalianJob
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 387
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 12:09 pm
Location: France
Top

Postby Scour on Sun Jan 15, 2006 8:26 pm

ItalianJob wrote:4166 rare ? Not so rare here in France


Sorry, I meant reviews of the 4166 are rare
Benq DW 1640 and 1650 , Plextor PX-755, Pioneer BDR-208 and 209D, LG GH24NSC0, LG BH16NS40 and 16NS55, Liteon ihas 124F and 324F, Pioneer DVR-215 and S21, Samsung SH-224DB and 224GB, and some more

cu
Scour
Scour
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 1933
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2001 8:00 pm
Location: Germany
Top

Postby Wesociety on Mon Jan 16, 2006 2:18 am

Hmmm, I'm still suspicious of overall write quality since the drive uses a Panasonic chipset...
I look forward to the review Ian.
User avatar
Wesociety
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 1234
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:33 am
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Top

Postby ItalianJob on Mon Jan 16, 2006 8:10 am

Wesociety wrote:Hmmm, I'm still suspicious of overall write quality since the drive uses a Panasonic chipset...
I look forward to the review Ian.


Yeah, a Panasonic MN103 chipset is used in LG 4164 and LG 4166 :
Image

LG 4163 / 4165 and 4167 use Renesas chipset (4167) :
Image

What was used by the 4160 ? And was the 4160 a good drive ?
User avatar
ItalianJob
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 387
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 12:09 pm
Location: France
Top

Postby dodecahedron on Mon Jan 16, 2006 8:38 am

Wesociety wrote:Hmmm, I'm still suspicious of overall write quality since the drive uses a Panasonic chipset...
I look forward to the review Ian.

is there reason to think that a Panasonic chipset is no good (bad writing quality) ?
One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them,
One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them
In the land of Mordor, where the Shadows lie
-- JRRT
M.C. Escher - Reptilien
User avatar
dodecahedron
DVD Polygon
 
Posts: 6865
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2002 12:04 am
Location: Israel
Top

Postby Ian on Mon Jan 16, 2006 8:57 am

dodecahedron wrote:is there reason to think that a Panasonic chipset is no good (bad writing quality) ?


Maybe because Panasonic's own drives don't deliver good writing quality?
"Blu-ray is just a bag of hurt." - Steve Jobs
User avatar
Ian
Grand Poobah
 
Posts: 15145
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2001 2:34 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Top

Postby ItalianJob on Mon Jan 16, 2006 10:21 am

Ian wrote:
dodecahedron wrote:is there reason to think that a Panasonic chipset is no good (bad writing quality) ?


Maybe because Panasonic's own drives don't deliver good writing quality?


I've only had a bad burn with 1.01 firmware and it was on a Memorex 8X RitekG05 crap (that didn't burn also on PX-716UF 1.09). Maybe LG firmware's developers did a good job ?
Or maybe Panasonic are better now. It's possible...
This has nothing to do with Panasonic, but I see that last Liteon's drives are getting better & better. Seems more & more difficult to find a very bad 16X burner now.
User avatar
ItalianJob
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 387
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 12:09 pm
Location: France
Top

Postby Wesociety on Mon Jan 16, 2006 12:54 pm

Along with Panasonic's own drives, the Teac/BenQ DQ60 with a Panasonic chipset had not so good writing quality.
User avatar
Wesociety
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 1234
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:33 am
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Top

Postby dolphinius_rex on Mon Jan 16, 2006 3:03 pm

Wesociety wrote:Along with Panasonic's own drives, the Teac/BenQ DQ60 with a Panasonic chipset had not so good writing quality.


Yeah, the whole chipset seems to suck! :o
Punch Cards -> Paper Tape -> Tape Drive -> 8" Floppy Diskette -> 5 1/4" Floppy Diskette -> 3 1/2" "Flippy" Diskette -> CD-R -> DVD±R -> BD-R

The Progression of Computer Media
User avatar
dolphinius_rex
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 6923
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 6:14 pm
Location: Vancouver B.C. Canada
Top

Postby Scour on Mon Jan 16, 2006 4:09 pm

Wesociety wrote:Along with Panasonic's own drives, the Teac/BenQ DQ60 with a Panasonic chipset had not so good writing quality.


Saw some good scans from 4166-burned media. Looks like the LG had the best writing quality, other drives with Panasonic-chipsets like Benq DQ 60 lloks not so good.
Benq DW 1640 and 1650 , Plextor PX-755, Pioneer BDR-208 and 209D, LG GH24NSC0, LG BH16NS40 and 16NS55, Liteon ihas 124F and 324F, Pioneer DVR-215 and S21, Samsung SH-224DB and 224GB, and some more

cu
Scour
Scour
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 1933
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2001 8:00 pm
Location: Germany
Top

Postby ItalianJob on Mon Jan 16, 2006 4:44 pm

The chipset is only the brain of the optical drive, not the eye... I think there is a chance the LG 4166 has still a good optical part in it.

Some more good burn I saw :

- YUDEN T02 @8X with firmware 1.00
Image
Image

- A DVD-R 8X (TYG02) @8X burned on a LG 4166 fw 1.01 and scanned on a NEC @ 5X
Image

- A burn I did : a Yuden T01 (Maxell in case) DVD+R 4X @ 4X :
Image
Scan on my old BenQ 1620 :
Image

- A Datawrite DVD+R 8X in spindle @ 8X
Image
Scan :
Image

Want more ? :wink:
User avatar
ItalianJob
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 387
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 12:09 pm
Location: France
Top

Postby dolphinius_rex on Mon Jan 16, 2006 5:38 pm

That's weird to see it jump from 4x to 8x recording on the burn speed graph. Isn't there usually a jump to 6x (or it just starts at 6x)??
Punch Cards -> Paper Tape -> Tape Drive -> 8" Floppy Diskette -> 5 1/4" Floppy Diskette -> 3 1/2" "Flippy" Diskette -> CD-R -> DVD±R -> BD-R

The Progression of Computer Media
User avatar
dolphinius_rex
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 6923
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 6:14 pm
Location: Vancouver B.C. Canada
Top

Postby ItalianJob on Mon Jan 16, 2006 5:42 pm

dolphinius_rex wrote:That's weird to see it jump from 4x to 8x recording on the burn speed graph. Isn't there usually a jump to 6x (or it just starts at 6x)??


8X Z-CLV (4X-8X) :-?
Strange decision... I takes 9 min for a 8X burn.

But 16X CAV 8)
I takes < 6 min for a full 16X burn (and I know the 4167 did a bit better Ian :P because of P-CAV)
User avatar
ItalianJob
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 387
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 12:09 pm
Location: France
Top

Postby Scour on Tue Jan 17, 2006 9:20 am

Hello!

The quality looks good, maybe the LG-guys do a good fine-tuning with newer FWs
Benq DW 1640 and 1650 , Plextor PX-755, Pioneer BDR-208 and 209D, LG GH24NSC0, LG BH16NS40 and 16NS55, Liteon ihas 124F and 324F, Pioneer DVR-215 and S21, Samsung SH-224DB and 224GB, and some more

cu
Scour
Scour
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 1933
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2001 8:00 pm
Location: Germany
Top
Post a reply

Return to DVD Writers

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 2 guests

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
All Content is Copyright (c) 2001-2025 CDRLabs Inc.