While CPU, memory, OS and other variables don't often make a huge difference, there are some nonetheless. We have a computer that is used only for testing hardware. We do this so all tests can be compared reliably.

Test System:

CPU:  AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ 2.4GHz 
Motherboard: ASUS M2N-SLI Deluxe with BIOS 0304
Memory: Corsair TWIN2X2048-6400
Video Card: MSI NX7900GT-T2D256E - ForceWare v93.71
Hard Drive: Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 SATA 3.0Gb/s 320GB
Operating System: Windows XP SP2 - NVIDIA nForce v9.16

For DVD writers the performance tests are broken down into four sections: CD read, CD write, DVD read and DVD write tests. Each benchmark test has been run three times. The score given is an average of the three. DMA has been enabled in device manager for all IDE devices supporting it.

CD Read Tests: For the read performance section of the CD-ROM benchmarks, CD WinBench 99 and CD Speed are used to test transfer speeds, seek times and CPU usage. For DAE testing, CD Speed is used to give an overall speed rating and is used in combination with CD DAE to see how well a drive reads scratched and dirty discs.

CD Write Tests: To test the write speeds, Nero Burning Rom is used to write 700MB to our test media. Times are recorded. To test rewrite scores, Nero is used again to time how long it takes to write 400MB of random files and directories. Then Sonic's DLA is used to test packet writing speeds. The same files are copied and pasted in Windows Explorer and timed.

DVD Read Tests: For the read performance section of the DVD benchmarks, CD Speed is used to test read speeds, seek times, and CPU usage.

DVD Write Tests: To test the DVD write speeds, Nero Burning Rom is used to write 4GB to our test media. Times are recorded. Then Sonic's DLA is used to test packet writing speeds. The same files are copied and pasted in Windows Explorer and timed.

CD Winbench 99 Scores:

  Optiarc
AD-7240S
Samsung
SH-S223Q
LG
GH22LP20
Optiarc
AD-7200S
CD Winbench 99 1575 KB/sec 2160 KB/sec 2047 KB/sec 1695 KB/sec
Transfer Rate: Inside 2780 KB/sec 3070 KB/sec 3170 KB/sec 2800 KB/sec
Transfer Rate: Outside 6360 KB/sec 6450 KB/sec 6470 KB/sec 6370 KB/sec
Random Access Time 146ms 87ms 93ms 130ms
CPU Utilization 1.97% 3.54% 4.27% 2.22%

The CD Winbench test is as close as we can get to testing every day usage. It fires off eight different applications using scripts. This tries to mimic the activities of a person loading these programs onto their own computer.

Optiarc's new DVD writer gave us some mixed performance in our CD Winbench tests. While the AD-7200S's overall score wasn't as high as some of the other drives, its transfer rates were fairly good. It started reading at 18.5x (2780 / 150) and reached a maximum speed of about 42.4x (6370 / 150) on the outside.

CD Speed v4.7.7.16 - Pressed CD:

For this test I used a pressed CD containing one Mode 1 data track. The disc is 74:38 in size and is full of data and directories.


 
   Optiarc
AD-7240S
Samsung
SH-S223Q
LG
GH22LP20
Optiarc
AD-7200S
Transfer Speed
Average:
Start:
End:

35.51x
20.37x
46.95x

35.98x
20.97x
47.60x

35.59x
20.56x
47.15x

35.50x
20.41x
46.96x
Seek Times
Random:
1/3:
Full:

151ms
164ms
259ms

101ms
106ms
176ms

101ms
107ms
171ms

143ms
157ms
236ms
CPU Usage
1x:
2x:
4x:
8x:

19%
1%
2%
3%

0%
1%
1%
3%

0%
1%
2%
4%

16%
1%
2%
4%

The AD-7240S didn't perform as well as I had expected when reading pressed CD's. While rated at 48x, Optiarc's new drive came up a little short of this number in our tests. Looking at the other scores, its seek times were also a little higher than we'd like to see.

CD Speed v4.7.7.16 - CD-R Media:

For this test I made a copy of our pressed test CD. I used 12x rated Memorex Gold 74 minute media for the tests.

   Optiarc
AD-7240S
Samsung
SH-S223Q
LG
GH22LP20
Optiarc
AD-7200S
Transfer Speed
Average:
Start:
End:

36.26x
20.72x
48.04x

31.31x
18.09x
41.48x

36.36x
20.74x
48.20x

36.25x
20.62x
48.01x
Seek Times
Random:
1/3:
Full:

154ms
187ms
260ms

97ms
106ms
174ms

102ms
111ms
175ms

143ms
169ms
243ms
CPU Usage
1x:
2x:
4x:
8x:

20%
1%
2%
4%

0%
1%
2%
4%

0%
1%
2%
4%

16%
1%
2%
4%

The AD-7240S was a little faster when reading CD-R media. While this wasn't enough to top the drive from LG, it had no problems reaching a maximum transfer speed of 48x in our tests. Unfortunately, its seek times were again a little high.

Optiarc's new DVD writer had some trouble reading our 99 minute CompUSA media. If the session on the CD was larger than 90 minutes in size, the AD-7240S would not recognize the disc correctly. Using a disc with about 90 minutes worth of data, I was able to reach a maximum read speed of about 48.02x. 

CD Speed v4.7.7.16 - CD-RW Media:

For this test I made a copy of a pressed test CD. I used some PNY 80 minute CD-RW media for the tests.

   Optiarc
AD-7240S
Samsung
SH-S223Q
LG
GH22LP20
Optiarc
AD-7200S
Transfer Speed
Average:
Start:
End:

30.72x
17.76x
40.01x

30.76x
18.08x
40.63x

31.25x
18.11x
41.29x

30.71x
17.71x
40.00x
Seek Times
Random:
1/3:
Full:

154ms
183ms
258ms

97ms
102ms
175ms

102ms
111ms
171ms

144ms
155ms
239ms
CPU Usage
1x:
2x:
4x:
8x:

13%
1%
2%
4%

0%
1%
2%
3%

0%
1%
2%
4%

8%
1%
2%
3%

While the AD-7240S can read pressed and CD-R media at 48x, its CD-RW read speeds are limited to only 40x. As you can see, the drive had no problems reaching this speed in our tests.

CD DAE and CD Speed v4.7.7.16 (DAE) - Pressed CD:

For this test I used Pure Funk. The CD is almost exactly 74 minutes. This helps to squeeze the maximum performance out of the CD.

Exact Audio Copy can tell us a lot about a drive's capabilities. Looking at the screenshot, you can see that the Optiarc AD-7240S supports accurate stream, caches audio data and has the ability to retrieve C2 error information from audio CD's.  


 
CD Speed Optiarc
AD-7240S
Samsung
SH-S223Q
LG
GH22LP20
Optiarc
AD-7200S
Average:
Start:
End:
DAE Quality:
Accurate Stream:
30.63x
17.71x
40.01x
10
Yes
30.66x
17.73x
40.44x
10
Yes
31.44x
18.21x
41.56x
10
Yes
30.89x
17.71x
40.00x
10
Yes

The AD-7240S did fairly well in our DAE tests. While not nearly as fast as some of the other DVD writers we've tested, it had no problems ripping pressed audio CD's at 40x.

CD DAE and CD Speed v4.7.7.16 (DAE) - CD-R Media:

For this test I used a copy of the Pure Funk CD. It's burned onto the same Memorex Gold 74 minute media I used in the CD Speed tests.

CD Speed Optiarc
AD-7240S
Samsung
SH-S223Q
LG
GH22LP20
Optiarc
AD-7200S
Average:
Start:
End:
DAE Quality:
Accurate Stream:
30.92x
17.85x
40.87x
10
Yes
30.94x
17.74x
40.90x
10
Yes
31.15x
18.15x
41.04x
10
Yes
30.62x
17.69x
40.01x
10
Yes

The AD-7240S was slightly faster when ripping audio CD-R discs. Unfortunately, even with this increase in speed, it wasn't as fast as the LG GH22LP20. So how did it do in CD Speed's advanced DAE tests? Take a look below.

Optiarc's DVD writer completed CD Speed's advanced DAE tests with an average score of 29.42x. The drive had no problems passing all of the on-the-fly tests and did not create any errors. If you look at the advanced features, you can see that the AD-7240S was able to read the CD-Text and subchannel data but failed to read the lead in and lead out sections of the CD.

To see how well the AD-7240S can read scratched and dirty discs, I used CD Speed's ScanDisc utility to see how many sectors were damaged or unreadable. This is a very rough, but good way to test the drive's error correcting abilities.


CD Speed - ScanDisc

The AD-7240S handled scratched discs relatively well. By looking at the screenshot, you can see that the drive considered only 58% of the CD to be "damaged".  More importantly, none of the sectors on the disc were unreadable.

You can also get an idea of how well the drive can read scratched and dirty discs by using CD DAE. The application extracts the audio tracks twice and then compares them. From this information we can see what the drive's average speed was and how many errors it generated.

CD DAE Avg. Speed Errors % of Disc

Optiarc AD-7240S

11.6x 2796031 0.36%

Samsung SH-S223Q

23.3x 1332069 0.17%

LG GH22LP20

28.2x 613565 1.71%

Pioneer DVR-116D

25.3x 99768247 12.73%

The AD-7240S gave us some mixed results in this test.  While the number of errors was very low, the scratches on the disc caused it to slow down considerably.